Ofek Shimanov vs Giulio Perego Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Ofek Shimanov's recent second serve points win percentage is 37.89%, whereas Giulio Perego's is higher at 44.84%. Could this give Perego an edge?
• In terms of returning second serves, Shimanov is slightly more successful with 47.22%, compared to Perego's 46.55%. First serve return rates are similar at 29.29% for Shimanov and 30.08% for Perego.
• Shimanov demonstrates better breakpoint saving capabilities, with a rate of 56.47% compared to Perego's 48.97%.
• Over the past year, Shimanov has a match win rate of 58.82% (10/7), while Perego has a higher win rate of 65.79% (25/13). Does this indicate that Perego is the stronger player overall?
• Shimanov excels on indoor hard surfaces with a 100% win rate (1/0), but Perego is also unbeaten on hard courts at 100% success (17/10).
• Both players have been active mostly in Futures/ITF $10K events. Perego shows a higher win percentage (65.79% compared to Shimanov's 56.25%) in these tournaments.
• Perego has played against slightly higher-ranked opponents (average 191.45) than Shimanov (average 219.71), which might reflect the competitive edge in match experience.
• In deciding sets, Shimanov has won all his matches recently, whereas Perego has won only 30% of these situations, suggesting Shimanov's superior mental toughness.
• Shimanov is more effective in converting breakpoints, with a recent conversion rate of 55.56%, significantly higher than Perego's 38.71%.

Editorial Prediction (November 28, 2025, UTC):

Based on recent statistics, both players show competitive strengths. Ofek Shimanov has demonstrated exceptional performance in converting breakpoints and handling deciding sets, reflecting his resilience in critical moments. His slight advantage in returning the opponent's second serve could also influence the match dynamics.

Giulio Perego, however, holds a stronger overall win rate and a higher recent success rate on hard courts. His experience against tougher opponents might also provide him with the skills needed to handle pressure effectively, although he has a lower breakpoint saving percentage.

Given these factors, although there is a strong case for Shimanov based on mental toughness and in-play adaptability, Giulio Perego's consistent performance over the past year on hard surfaces might just give him the slight edge to win this encounter.